Wati alternatives
By Joris van Huët · each comparison from the vendors' own pricing and help pages, prices dated on the page
The short answer: 3 tools are compared with Wati on this site, and the line under each one is the verdict from its comparison: who should pick which, with the figures that decide it on the comparison itself. Read the one that names your job. What Wati costs and who it suits is in its entry, and how to use Wati walks through one job with it.
Disclosure: I may earn a commission through some links on this site. It does not change what this page says.
AiSensy
For a brand that mostly broadcasts to Indian customers and answers replies by hand with a team of five or six, AiSensy is the lower bill: its Basic plan is $45 a month on monthly billing with one owner and five agent logins, and its card charges $0.014 per marketing message to an Indian number against Wati's $0.0189.
Interakt
If eight people answer WhatsApp and Instagram for a brand selling mostly in India, Interakt costs far less to staff: its Growth plan is $55 a month on monthly billing with unlimited agents in all roles, while Wati's Growth plan stops at three users and its Pro plan, $149, includes five and charges $39 for each one.
respond.io
If WhatsApp is mainly where you send offers to an opted-in list and three people handle the replies, Wati is the lower bill at small volumes: Growth costs $69 a month on monthly billing and includes 15,000 broadcasts, where respond.io's cheapest plan with broadcasts is Growth at $199 (Wati pricing, respond.io pricing).
A senior operator doing the work: campaigns, channels, CRM and AI agents, live from day one.
With Joris van Huët, interim and fractional CMO in Utrecht. From EUR 5,000 a month, monthly cycles, a 30-day exit.