Fireflies.ai alternatives
By Joris van Huët · each comparison from the vendors' own pricing and help pages, prices dated on the page
The short answer: 4 tools are compared with Fireflies.ai on this site, and the line under each one is the verdict from its comparison: who should pick which, with the figures that decide it on the comparison itself. Read the one that names your job. What Fireflies.ai costs and who it suits is in its entry, and how to use Fireflies.ai walks through one job with it.
Disclosure: I may earn a commission through some links on this site. It does not change what this page says.
Granola
Choose Fireflies.ai if your job is a shared library of what customers said. Choose Granola if your job is leaving each meeting with notes and nothing else stored.
Fireflies.ai vs Granola: A Team Call Library or Private Notes
Notta
If your work is interviews and recordings made elsewhere, often needing a second language, Notta fits: it imports files of up to 5 hours and translates transcripts from Pro, which costs $97.99 for a year, shown as $8.17 a month, or $13.49 paid monthly (Notta pricing, import article).
Notta vs Fireflies.ai: Interview Files or a Sales Call Archive
Otter.ai
For up to five people meeting in English, Otter.ai is the cheaper seat: Otter Pro costs $8.33 per user each month on yearly billing, against $10 for Fireflies.ai Pro.
tl;dv
Choose tl;dv if your job is showing colleagues what a customer said; choose Fireflies.ai if your job is a cheap, complete archive of what every rep heard.
A senior operator doing the work: campaigns, channels, CRM and AI agents, live from day one.
With Joris van Huët, interim and fractional CMO in Utrecht. From EUR 5,000 a month, monthly cycles, a 30-day exit.