WebinarJam alternatives
By Joris van Huët · each comparison from the vendors' own pricing and help pages, prices dated on the page
The short answer: 4 tools are compared with WebinarJam on this site, and the line under each one is the verdict from its comparison: who should pick which, with the figures that decide it on the comparison itself. Read the one that names your job. What WebinarJam costs and who it suits is in its entry, and how to use WebinarJam walks through one job with it.
Disclosure: I may earn a commission through some links on this site. It does not change what this page says.
EverWebinar
If you present at least one live webinar and want the recording to keep running on a schedule, buy WebinarJam Basic, not EverWebinar: Basic costs $79 a month billed annually, $948 a year, for 500 attendees, and the WebinarJam pricing page says EverWebinar is included in Basic and above at no additional cost.
StreamYard
Choose StreamYard if your job is an audience on other people's platforms; choose WebinarJam if your job is a sale to people who gave you their email.
WebinarGeek
A B2B team in Europe running a monthly lead webinar for about 250 people, with HubSpot behind it and a privacy officer asking about consent, fits WebinarGeek: Premium at 250 viewers is €119 a month billed yearly or €199 on monthly billing, from a Dutch company that puts its data processing agreement in its standard.
Zoom
If your company already runs on Zoom Workplace and the webinar is a briefing for customers or prospects, with questions and a recording, add Zoom Webinars: 500 attendees cost $129 a month on monthly billing or $83.33 a month billed annually as one upfront charge, and every webinar card states that a Zoom Workplace.
WebinarJam vs Zoom: Built to Sell or Already on Every Laptop
A senior operator doing the work: campaigns, channels, CRM and AI agents, live from day one.
With Joris van Huët, interim and fractional CMO in Utrecht. From EUR 5,000 a month, monthly cycles, a 30-day exit.